A Rockland activist was dragged out of a public hearing for criticizing gerrymandering. Now he is suing the county, the Legislature, Chairman Jay Hood, and the Sheriff's Office in federal court.
On April 14, 2026, the Rockland County Legislature voted 14 to 1 to pass a sweeping rewrite of the county's home improvement contractor licensing law. Six days later, longtime Rockland activist and former candidate for County Executive Michael Parietti filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the County, the Legislature, Legislature Chairman Jay Hood, and the Rockland County Sheriff's Office.
The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in White Plains, alleges that Parietti's First and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when he was forcibly removed from the legislative chamber in the middle of his public comment.
This is a Rockland County story with statewide implications, and if you live anywhere from Suffern to Nanuet to Pearl River to Nyack to Orangetown, it should be on your radar.
The hearing was held at the Rockland County Board of Elections building in New City. The chamber was standing room only. On the agenda: a brand new contractor licensing law that would replace decades of consumer protection rules originally laid out in Local Law No. 8 of 1984.
According to the Rockland County Times reporting on the meeting, members of the public — including licensed contractors and concerned homeowners — spoke against the law. Many said they had only learned about the proposal the day of the meeting. The bill itself, roughly 30 pages, had been publicly noticed on April 8, leaving the community six days to read, digest, and respond.
"It seemed that many speakers first heard about the bill the day of, leaving inadequate time to read a thirty page legal document before the 7 p.m. meeting." — The Rockland County Times
The previous regulations, last amended by Local Law No. 1 of 2016, required prospective home improvement and swimming pool contractors to clear a fairly demanding gate. Applicants had to submit an application and fee, prove their experience, provide reference letters, prove insurance coverage, register their vehicle, certify child support compliance, pass a written exam, and appear in front of an eleven-member board.
Under the new law, introduced by Legislator Itamar Yeger (D-4), most of that goes away or gets dramatically softened.
The law goes into effect when the existing 1984 framework expires in roughly six months.
The pushback from the community at the April 14 hearing was not coming from a fringe corner. It was coming from the people who already hold licenses and the homeowners who hire them.
Licensed contractors argued that the existing process is already accessible to anyone willing to put in the work, and that loosening it will flood the market with operators who shouldn't be holding a license at all. Homeowners pointed to a basic, practical question: when criminal penalties for licensing violations are removed and the review board loses its teeth, who exactly does the consumer call when a job goes sideways?
Anyone who has ever signed a contract for a kitchen remodel, a roof replacement, a pool installation, or a basement finish in Rockland understands the stakes here. Bad contractors don't just take money. They leave families living inside half-finished construction zones for months while disputes drag through small claims court.
Supporters of the new law argue the old framework operated as red tape — an effectively closed system that made it next to impossible for newcomers to break into the industry. That is a legitimate position. The fight over which version best serves Rockland is exactly the kind of debate the public hearing was supposed to host.
Parietti's removal is the moment that turned a contentious hearing into a federal court filing.
According to his complaint, when Parietti took the microphone, he chose to speak about gerrymandering. He argued that the legislative map adopted by Rockland County has produced a Legislature in which the Hasidic community holds outsized political power, and that this power dynamic is the reason a law making it easier to obtain contracting licenses was moving through the chamber on a 14 to 1 track.
Whether you agree with that argument or not is, legally speaking, beside the point. The point is what happened next.
Chairman Jay Hood characterized Parietti's remarks as "hate speech" and directed Rockland County Sheriff's deputies to remove him from the chamber. They did.
Earlier in the same hearing, according to the complaint, another speaker had referenced immigrants — including undocumented immigrants — as a reason to oppose the legislative changes. Hood took no action at the time. He later acknowledged he was wrong to have allowed those comments to pass without intervention. But the contrast was stark: anti-immigrant comments allowed; criticism of gerrymandering removed under armed guard.
"What makes America special is that the government doesn't get to decide which viewpoints are acceptable." — Robert Zitt, attorney for Michael Parietti
Parietti is represented by New City attorney Robert Zitt. The lawsuit alleges that his removal was based on the content and viewpoint of his speech, not on any disruption or threat. The complaint specifically notes that Parietti did not use profanity, did not make threats, and did not engage in conduct that would have justified removal under any neutral application of meeting rules.
The complaint also reaches beyond the individual incident. It alleges that the suppression of Parietti's speech reflects "policies, practices, customs and usages" of Rockland County, including permitting presiding officials to remove speakers based on viewpoint, failing to adequately train officials on First Amendment limitations, and authorizing or ratifying the use of law enforcement to suppress protected speech.
Parietti is asking the federal court for:
There are two stories braided together here, and both touch every household in this county.
The first is consumer protection. The contractor licensing rules being replaced are not abstract bureaucratic infrastructure. They are the rails that determine who can knock on your door, hand you an estimate, take a deposit, and tear up your kitchen. When those rails change, the risk profile of every home improvement project in Rockland changes with it. If you are planning a renovation, a pool installation, or any significant home improvement project in the next year, you have a direct stake in how this law is implemented and enforced.
The second is your right to walk into your own county legislature and say something the people running the meeting do not want to hear. That is not an abstract constitutional principle either. It is the difference between a public hearing and a press conference.
The case is now in federal court. The County will need to respond to the complaint, and the matter will proceed through the usual stages of federal civil litigation: motions to dismiss, discovery, and possibly trial. Cases of this kind can take months or years to resolve, but key rulings — particularly on any motion to dismiss — typically come earlier and can shape the entire posture of the case.
The new contractor law, meanwhile, is on a separate track. It takes effect when the previous law expires in approximately six months, regardless of what happens with the lawsuit, unless legislative action or court intervention changes that.
This is the kind of story that often disappears after the initial news cycle. We're not letting that happen. We will be reporting on every motion, every hearing, and every ruling, and we will be tracking how the new contractor licensing regime gets implemented on the ground in Rockland.
I'm Peter Sisca, a licensed real estate broker with Real Broker NY LLC, serving Rockland County, Bergen County, Westchester, Staten Island, NYC, The Bronx, Putnam, Orange County, and Greenwich CT. If you want a Realtor who actually pays attention to local policy because it affects your property — let's talk.
Visit siscamoves.com · Follow @siscamoves